The Rachel Silva affect
Jun 17th, 2008 by Mark
Wanted Parolee shot by OPD, and widow
It was only a matter of time before the scum figured out it was lottery time if you had dealt with the police recently. Another Rachel Silva type is on the loose, looking to shake down the Police.
Show me the money!
She says she just wants answers. She doesn’t say what the questions are, that are unanswered.
OCEANSIDE, Calif. — A woman whose husband was fatally shot by an Oceanside police officer said she wants her questions answered.
Oh sorry, she wants HER questions answered. Well excuse me, Miss Thang.
So what happened? Pretty simple, he Parolee husband decided he was Superman. He found out he was wrong.
On December 22, 2007, Siaki “Ramon” Del Rio allegedly led police on a high-speed chase through North County that ended when he crashed into a mobile home park.
Police said Del Rio, a parolee and father of two young boys, refused to surrender without a fight and told them he had a gun and threatened to use it.
Keep that last line in mind. It’s important.
Del Rio was shot and killed by police to end the incident.
Well that would make sense … but not to the desperately seeking attention widow. No, she doesn’t get it.
Del Rio’s wife, Deana Del Rio, said she wanted $60 million for the wrongful death of her husband.
The “wrongful death” of her husband. Yea, O.K.
Out to get him!
She had this astute observation.
“I believe from the get-go they didn’t want anything to do with him,” said Deana.
Well, duh. He’s a parolee, who said he had a gun and would use it. That seems to have escaped her.
The claim also stated, “… OPD attempted to cover up the gross misconduct of the police officers by reporting to the media … he had a gun and threatened to use it …”
It gets even better.
Additionally, the claim said that the “… shooting was illegal and unauthorized … with malice and the intent to kill Del Rio.”
“Unauthorized”? WTF does that mean? Oh wait the “Rachel Silva” code of gun fire. The new 50 step process you must follow before discharging your weapon. Yea got it. Wait, he was killed last year, so they must not have been in affect. Guess the 35 step process was not to her liking.
[NOTE: some of you may be wondering what I am talking about. There is not 35 step or 50 step process for weapons discharge. This is a sarcastic comment on the current state of anti-cop dumbasses in San Diego and their idiotic response to Rachel Silva and her drunken stupidity. I will have a post later this week on the process]
Oh who am I kidding, she is nothing but a gold-bricker doing some gold-digging. She figures this is her lottery ticket. Queue sympathy, tears, and violins.
Del Rio’s wife, Deana Del Rio, said she wanted $60 million for the wrongful death of her husband. The claim will be filed in Oceanside on Tuesday.
Damn! Parolees must be pulling down some heavy duty scratch these days. Guess the drug trade is gooooood! OK I don’t know what he does for a living — he did have a conviction for drug possession that came with a life sentence; I am guessing trafficking. — , if he even works, I doubt she does … much of anything except eat.
Wait, could that be it? She lost her meal ticket. Now she has to actually go to work. That’s not for her. She could get a settlement and not have to work ever again.
Deana’s claim said her husband “… was unarmed and did not brandish a weapon … OPD planted a gun in Del Rio’s clothing after the shooting …”
“Numerous people have told me that night that there was no weapon on him and the witness was able to verify with me,” said Deana.
I am laughing so hard my sides hurt. The classic “they planted the gun” — did any of these “witnesses” tell you that? — , followed by “people told me” this and that, capped off with certitude of verification by people who are unknown. *ROTFLMAO* Who are these “numerous” outstanding citizens? More ghetto dwellers hoping for some coin to fall from your big settlement?
This is how clear she is thinking.
Deana said his criminal past shouldn’t have been a factor on the night of the shooting …
Are you kidding me? He is a parolee, who was given a life sentence for drugs — which was overturned, the incompetent and pro-criminal ch 10 does not say if it was still pending — ; and they should assume he was a ‘nice boy’. Yea, right.
This from an earlier article on the original incident.
Court records show that Del Rio was involved in from four to eight prior criminal cases from 1996-2001; details were unavailable Sunday.
The pursuit began on Big Bend Way at about 6:29 p.m., after the officers attempted to stop a man, later identified as Del Rio, who they recognized as being wanted for a felony warrant, the sergeant said.
Rut Roh! Felony warrant.
A man wanted for a felony parole violation was shot dead by Oceanside police who said they struggled with him at the end of a brief chase, police said Sunday.
Not only does he have a warrant, it’s a felony warrant, and he is wanted for a Parole Violation. That means he is dangerous … and she feels his criminal past has no bearing on how they treat him. Are you high?
So cops having some sense, clearly; did not take her advice and assumed he was ‘not so nice’. Good call in my opinion.
Del Rio, who Mata said was considered armed and dangerous , allegedly took off. Mata said a chase ensued for about four minutes and ended less than two miles away, when the suspect crashed into a shed and chain-link fence at a mobile home park in the 200 block of North El Camino Real.
Del Rio refused to comply with officers’ orders and resisted “violently” when they wrestled with him in an attempt to take him into custody near the vehicle, Mata said. In a news release, Mata said that Del Rio told the officers he had a gun and threatened to use it “as they struggled to gain control of him.”
OMG, I thought she said, that they said, he HAD a gun? Seems clear they said, he said, that he had a gun. Oh no, what will she do, now?
“I need closure to know what exactly happened,” said Deana.
No what you need is to get a job, get on a diet, and get off the pity train. If you want closure, start with growing up and NOT dating criminals.
No doubt he did not want to go back to prison. Guess he should have thought of that BEFORE he decided to violate his parole, and run from Police, and become a criminal in the first place. Then again maybe he did? And Deanna if you date criminals, some times they don’t come home. That’s part of the job description.
Other coverage
Tags: oceanside, rachel silva, siaki ramon del rio, deanna del rio, lawsuit, police
wow you really are a sanctimonious know it all. You should do a little research before engaging in your mouth diarrea. then you would know that this woman is a hard working mother of 2 boys who have been through hell. She works 60 hours a week and cares for the kids that self-rightous bigots like you want to ignore. A little research would also have shown you that Siaki was in the process of getting clean. He had asked for help repeatedly. It was no accident they “found him”. It was because he was staying in touch with the 2-faced liar who was supposed to be helping him get admitted to a hospital. The truth is they could have taken him in numerous other times without using any force. OPD has the same mentality as many other street cops ie: “your one of us or you don’t deserve to live” What a laugh riot it will be when your turn comes….I dare you to go to a city where you aren’t known and take a stand for the constitution against one of these kind of cops….you will have a great awakening…ooops… that would take some guts and since you don’t even have the guts to research your story it’s very unlikely you would have the guts to tell a cop to obey the rules. It’s easier for losers like you to pretend that the cops are always right…if they are ever wrong then what does it say about your integrity to be living under the freedoms that the original “bad guys” fought for without having the guts to make the cops follow the rules…..guess you’ll have to answer that for yourself. Don’t bother posting a reply for my sake, I already have my answer to that question.
Wow! Someone found a dictionary. Clearly a liberal as well, hit the usual high points: bigot, liar, cop-lover, blah blah blah.
I find it ironic that you are upset about the cops following the rules, but don’t seem to care about criminals following the rules.
Why, if –as you say– “they could have taken him in numerous other times without using any force”; did they have to use force this time? Oh yeah, it’s their fault. It had nothing to do with him evading arrest, and sayng he had a gun.
I also like how you demand an answer and then say that I not bother because you have your answer. Of course you do, it’s one you made up to fit your bizzarro world of fiction that makes — I assume — your buddy sound like a ‘good guy’. Lots of talk of him trying, and yet no evidence of any success. There is no try, there is do or do not.
Oh, and unlike you, I routinely call on the cops — and DA — to do the right things. Guess you didn’t do your research, didcha? Unlike you I don’t assume they are always wrong, either. Ironic is it not that you are so critical of those who you think are just like you?
If she and you don’t want to be held out for ridicule, then don’t do stupid things. 60 Million? Please.
Boy look at how fat she is in the picture. What a fatty McFattertin. Figure she is trying to sue, she shacks up with a loser parollee, thief, and just overall pieace of sheet and when he finally gets too big for his behavior is taking care of she complains. Come on!!!! You were marrried to the guy and you didn’t see something like this coming? Did you know he carried a gun? Why would he? If you didn’t know then obviusly you guys were not close and you have no reason to care what happened to him. And if you did know he carried a gun then you have to be a moron not to see this as a possible ending to a pathetic story…. What kind of welfare soceity are we living in here where people like this actually think that they are entitled to something when their relative screws up? Kind of like those North Hollywood bank robbers when their family sued for the cops killing them, remarkable!!!!
You all are extremely rude and idiots. you should not talk about her when you don’t even know her. she probally works harder then all you for her great two boys ok. you guys need to get a life and quit bitching at other people for your problems. how dare you guys would bad mouth a loving mother and wife. she was there for him. If you really did your research you would know he was in a program and doing extremely well.So finding justice is no crime ok so you guys need to fuck off and worry about your own problems ok!
Wait a minute, you say we are not supposed to talk about her because we don’t know her; yet you talk about us and don’t know us.
How do you know we are idiots? You dont know us. Seems you are just upset that we hit the nail on the head.
As for this research that would prove he was doing well in a program; send it to me. No doubt you can’t.
Funny how you attack us, because you can’t disprove anything we have said.