Should the officer let her run him down BEFORE shooting her? That seems to be your attitude. Because a “woman and her son (both humans) HAVE BEEN SHOT” the cop is automatically guilty. It’s clear that the cop is not a Human in Allen’s (and other’s) view. How sad that some can not even see how stupid is that thinking.

The “fact” that an 8 year old boy was shot means nothing other than an 8 year old boy was shot. You think it means that the officer is automatically guilty, and some nefarious activity is afoot. Congrats you have proven that the attorney for Silva is correct in assuming that people like you will suck up his pablum.

Forget her past, forget her current transgression, forget that the Justice system has given her numerous chances, ignore that she was going to injure her child eventually, ignore that fact that she is acting like a typical criminal, ignore that she has refused to give a statement, ignore that she doesn’t remember anything yet she can file a claim — so she can sure later –; forget all of that they demand. You must forget all of that and send them cash, now. No trial, no statement, no facts, no nothing other than emotional outcries; send cash, now.

You people amaze me. You are so stupid, or you hate the cops to such a degree that you are willing to just assume a cop is guilty and then come up with the most idiotic reasons to defend those emotionaly immature reasons.

You then demand that I not “belittle” the situation, after you did exactly that.

Pull your heads out, people. This woman was headed for trouble long beofore she ran into officer White. She got lucky and hit the Justice Jackpot. Every other Drunkard would have killed their own child and you would be demanding that they be sent to prison forever.

Oh yeah, and why is she on her third attorney now?

I have a post about the video, which I will put up tomorrow. Seems it’s not quite the ’smoking gun’ everyone says. Everyone who hates cops, that is.

Oh, and let’s have a fair trial and then hang the cop. Oh to hell with it, just hang him now; why waste time and money on collecting evidence, getting stories — hey 3, yes THREE weeks on and NO statement from the “victim” — , analyzing evidence; let the media and lefty nut-balls convict the cop out of their own hatred. Yea that’s the ticket.

Anyone else find it funny that the left is suddenly all hell bent on law and order? Yea, so do I.

You claim that she has studied “police procedure.” I think most reasonable folks would realize that knowledge came from her lawyer, who has probably spent years doing research.

Umm hello, sarcasm. And you really don’t expect me to believe this amublance chaser knows anything about police standards, procedure, etc…

How can he know what is right and wrong here, especially when his star witness has no clue what happened. So she says — more sarcasm –, and watching the video, I am not buying her “act”.

puuuullllleeeaaaazzzzeeee

I see that you don’t really want comments so I’ll leave you be.

STILL NO STATEMENT. You say, “She has no excuse.” But she DOES have an excuse. Just because you and the cops want a statement doesn’t mean shit. Only a judge can force her to talk. If the road raged law man was a better shot and had killed her would you still be waiting for her statement? If the detectives don’t know what happened by now then lets turn the case over to Nancy Drew.

You go on and on and on about her “record,” but what does that have to do with the shooting. Even if she was drunk when did we start having our patrol offers execute drunks? Notice how the quickly the “tight lipped” department released her info. Have they told us about the gunman’s disciplinary incidents? How many other children has he tried to kill? Oh no, that might jeopardize the investigation. The cops are clearly trying to make her look bad to protect their brethren.

From the soap box. “Her son seems to have no issue recalling what happened.” I didn’t know the big bad police had released the results of their interrogation of the child. Where did you find that info? Please share as I would like to know what he said. For all I know he said “Go to hell for trying to kill my mommy.”

Her son seems to have no issue recalling what happened, he was shot and saw his mom shot. Hmmm.

She is a criminal. Two time loser (which means she was caught at least twice — no doubt a small portion of the transgressions — and finally made to answer at the level that was appropriate) and was flagrantly violating the law. Her excuse that she HAD to pick up her son is bull-crap. Are we to believe that she did not take her son to her friend’s house, or that they would not have dropped him off? Are we to believe she has not been violating the law for the last 3 months almost daily? Yea, right.

She is now gaming the system.

As for the statement by the son, it most likely will be challenged BUT HE IS NOT A SUSPECT so it will most likely stand.

As for officer White having an attorney present that is his right. Silva has had an attorney for 15 days now, actually two that we know of; and STILL NO STATEMENT.

It’s clear she has something to hide, and I believe she is lying. On the other hand OPD is not helping things with the stonewalling for information.